When it comes to nutritional management of growing and finishing cattle, the scientific aspects tend to get the most attention. Hours are spent getting the formulations right and debating the merits of different ingredients and additives.
In truth, feeding cattle successfully is as much art and judgment as science. Judgment is required to balance between over- and under-feeding. Under-feeding limits performance and possibly quality grade. Feeding too much increases feed waste and more importantly can trigger acidosis, poor performance, and increased death loss.
Tracking Feed Bunk Scores
An SDSU research study conducted by Bierman and Pritchard (1996) compared cattle fed all they would eat to those fed just enough so that all the feed was consumed in a 24-hr period. They observed that the steers fed with the slick bunk strategy had similar ADG but improved feed efficiency compared to the steers fed to appetite. There was also more variation in ADG among the steers fed all they would eat, suggesting that some of the steers may have experienced subclinical acidosis from over-consumption.
The goal should be to achieve dry matter intakes as close as possible to the cattle’s appetite, while avoiding roller coaster intake patterns. Dr. Robbi Pritchard at SDSU developed a widely-adopted scoring system to help cattle feeders minimize variation in feed intake and optimize performance (Table 1). Tracking bunk scores and amount of feed delivered will help identify pens that are right on track, those that should be offered more feed, and those that should be fed less. Over a period of 7 to 10 days, seeing bunk score of 0.5 two or three days with scores of zero for the balance of the period would indicate a good balance between high intake to support performance while minimizing inconsistencies in intake.
Table 1. SDSU Feedbunk Scoring System
|0||No feed remaining in bunk|
|0.5||Scattered feed remaining. Most of the bottom of the bunk exposed.|
|1||Thin, uniform layer of feed remaining. About 1 corn kernel deep.|
|2||25% to 50% of feed remaining.|
|3||More than 50% of feed remaining. Crown is thoroughly disturbed.|
|4||Feed is virtually untouched. Crown of feed still noticeable.|
Some guidelines for managing feed deliveries include:
The Iowa Beef Center at Iowa State University has recently released a free, updated fact sheet, Feed Bunk Management, that covers this subject in much greater detail, including pictures showing examples of different bunk scores.
Source: Warren Rusche, South Dakota State University
Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now