2020 INTERNSPublished May 20, 2020
Welcome to 3 Interns Joining the Country Partners Cooperative Team
Recent wet, cool weather has raised concerns about delays in planting, which could then lead to a switch in planting from corn to soybeans. From an economics standpoint, the decision to switch to soybeans likely will be dictated by how much nitrogen fertilizer has already been applied, given that already applied pesticides allow a switch to soybeans.
2017 Planting Progress in Perspective
While planting concerns exist, statistics released in May 8 reports by the National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) suggest that planting progress so far in 2017 is near five-year averages:
Illinois: 65% of the corn was planted by May 7 compared to a 63% five-year average. However, little progress was made between April 30 and May 7, with the percent planted increasing only 2 percentage points from 63% on April 30th to 65% on May 7th. As always, planting progress varies across the state, with the highest percent planted being in the West Southwest crop reporting district at 88% and the lowest in the Northwest district at 31%.
Ohio: 46% of the corn was planted by May 7 compared to a 38% five-year average.
Indiana: 51% of the corn was planted by May 7 compared to a 43% five-year average.
Iowa: 52% of the corn was planted by May 7 compared to a 55% five-year average.
Minnesota: 35% of the corn was planted by May 7 compared to a 55% five-year average.
Given recent slow planting progress, late planting will become more of a concern if wet, cool weather continues.
Corn Planting versus Soybeans Planting
When planting again resumes, a decision to plant corn or soybeans may be faced. As has been noted previously, prices and costs earlier in 2017 suggested that planting soybeans will be more profitable than planting corn. So far this growing season, prices have not changed these expectations: soybeans are expected to be more profitable than corn.
As later planting occurs, expected corn returns will decrease more than expected soybean returns because expected corn yields decrease more than expected soybean yields with late planting. Hence, comparison of all costs likely suggests planting soybeans.
However, the decision to switch from corn to soybeans should be influenced by pesticides and nitrogen fertilizer already applied. If certain herbicides have been applied, the ability to switch to soybeans may not exist.
If switching is an option, then the amount of nitrogen remaining to be applied will influence decisions. Nitrogen already applied is a sunk cost and should be excluded when making comparisons between expected corn and soybean returns.
The impact of applied nitrogen is illustrated for Central Illinois, high-productivity farmland using the “returns by planting date” sheet in the Planting Decision Model, a FAST spreadsheet available for download from the farmdoc website.
The example is for central Illinois, with inputs shown in Appendix A. The example has a maximum expected yield of 203 bushels per acre, which decreases after April 20. Yield on May 13 is expected to be 196 bushels per acre.
The maximum soybean yield is 61 bushels per acre. Yields decrease from this 61 bushel per acre maximum after April 27. The expected yield for a May 13 planting is 59 bushels per acre. Total non-land costs are $507 per acre for corn and $335 per acre for soybeans.
The non-land costs for corn include a $53 per acre cost for nitrogen fertilizer. The amount of nitrogen left to be applied will be varied below. Assuming that $40 remain to be applied means that roughly $13 of nitrogen already has been applied. Reported below are returns before land costs.
Figure 1 shows corn returns and soybean returns by date planted, given that $40 of nitrogen remain to be applied. Both corn and soybean returns go down after late April. In this case, soybeans are more profitable than corn throughout May.
Figure 2 shows returns given that $0 per acre of nitrogen needs to be applied. This situation could be a full application of nitrogen during the previous fall. In this case, corn is always expected to be more profitable than soybeans no matter the planting date.
Figure 3 shows returns given that $24 per acre of nitrogen remain to be applied. In this case, returns are relatively the same between corn and soybeans through May. Comparison of returns do not suggest a superior choice between corn and soybeans.
Already applied nitrogen will influence the economics of a switch from corn to soybeans. Having higher levels of nitrogen already will cause return comparison to more strongly suggest planting corn. The above analysis is for central Illinois. Comparisons will vary from those above for different regions.
Source: Gary Schnitkey, University of Illinois
Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now